Neptune and Aker engage in public war-of-words over krill patent

By Elaine Watson

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Neptune Aker Krill oil Patent United states patent and trademark office

Neptune and Aker engage in public war-of-words over krill patent
Suggestions by Aker Biomarine that Neptune Technologies and Bioressources misrepresented the novelty of the inventions claimed in its newly-granted krill oil patent are “baseless”, Neptune bosses have insisted.

Neptune and Aker have become embroiled in a public spat over the patent – issued on Tuesday – with Aker immediately filing a request for it to be re-examined and Neptune today issuing a press release rebutting claims made by Aker yesterday in comments to the media.

The patent, no. 8,057,825​, awards Neptune exclusive use of krill extracts in the US as a method for reducing cholesterol, platelet adhesion and plaque formation.

Aker: Neptune was not the first to discover the ability of krill oil’s cardio benefits

But Aker argues it was obtained because Neptune claimed “contrary to the facts, that it was the first to discover the ability of krill oil to lower cholesterol and reduce platelet adhesion and plaque formation​”.

It added: “The US patent office did not know, and was not informed by Neptune, of the numerous prior publications describing these same uses and benefits of krill oil. Aker BioMarine has, however, made the patent office aware of them.”

Aker went on to suggest that the ”mere fact that a re-examination is opened is a very strong indication that the USPTO will at least restrict the claims that were originally granted​”.

Neptune: We are confident in the validity of our patent

But this is not true, insisted Neptune president and chief executive Henri Harland.

“In fact the US Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) has not yet decided whether to grant Aker's request for re-examination… Accordingly, a reexamination of the '825 patent is not currently ‘opened’.

“In addition, contrary to Aker's assertion, the mere grant of a reexamination request provides no indication, let alone "a very strong indication", that the USPTO will restrict the claims of the issued patent.”

All of Neptune's representatives involved in the successful prosecution of the '825 patent “complied with their duty of candor to the USPTO and after a thorough review of Neptune's patent application, the USPTO deemed Neptune's claims to be novel and non-obvious, and therefore granted the '825 patent to Neptune”,​ he said.

We are confident that, even if Aker's request for re-examination is granted, the validity of the '825 patent will be confirmed.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Empowering consumers. Validating brands.

Empowering consumers. Validating brands.

Content provided by Nutrasource Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Services | 25-Jul-2023 | Product Brochure

IFOS™ (International Fish Oil Standards) is the unrivaled global leader in omega-3 certifications.

Exploring Wild Blueberries for Memory and Mood

Exploring Wild Blueberries for Memory and Mood

Content provided by Fruit d'Or | 10-Jul-2023 | White Paper

43% of U.S. consumers want foods and beverages to support mental and physical health, according to Mintel. Since wild blueberries have 2x the antioxidants,...

Carotenoids for longevity & healthy aging

Carotenoids for longevity & healthy aging

Content provided by Bio-gen Extracts Pvt. Ltd. | 21-Jun-2023 | White Paper

As the world's population ages, the need to provide a healthy lifespan or ‘health span’ has increased.


We're All In Trouble

Posted by Chance,

I would like to know who is the Einstein at the FDA & the Patent Office that is allowing nature to be patented? AND to put a monopoly on where it comes from? Are you kidding me?!!??
Moreover, what gives you the right to sell a patent on something that doesn't belong to you?

Seriously, at what point does someone stop the insanity, the greed, and actually show some integrity and intelligence... krill nor it's oil is not an invention.

Report abuse

Aker in Trouble

Posted by Phil M.,

First to file a new invention has priority to that invention under patent law.

I think Aker is in real trouble here. Neptune is the pioneer in this field and should greatly benefit with these patents as they built the industry.

Aker should pay royalties and move on.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more