Study links calcium supplements to doubling of heart attack risk

By Nathan Gray

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Calcium supplements Calcium Osteoporosis Nutrition

Study links calcium supplements to doubling of heart attack risk
Researchers have warned that calcium supplements should be ‘taken with caution’ after new findings suggested consumption of the supplements could double the risk of heart attack incidence.

The study – published in Heart​ – questions the safety of calcium supplement pills, suggesting that the mineral causes changes in blood vessels that could lead to twice the risk of heart attack.

"Calcium supplements have been widely embraced by doctors and the public, on the grounds that they are a natural and therefore safe way of preventing osteoporotic fractures,"​ said the researchers, led by Professor Sabine Rohrmann, from Zurich University's institute of social and preventative medicine.

"It is now becoming clear that taking this micronutrient in one or two daily ​[doses] is not natural, in that it does not reproduce the same metabolic effects as calcium in food," ​they added.

Rohrmann and her team argued: "We should return to seeing calcium as an important component of a balanced diet, and not as a low cost panacea to the universal problem of postmenopausal bone loss."

However many others have been keen to point out the importance of calcium for bone health: “The bottom line is consumers need calcium, and particularly for theelderly, who are at such great risk of falls and fractures due to weak bones, removing calcium supplements from their diets could put them at even greater risk for those kinds of problems,”​ said Dr Taylor Wallace, senior director, scientific & regulatory affairs, for the US-based Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN).

Wallace said the study itself “is not reason enough to discount the important benefits of calcium.”
"Calcium is an important mineral with proven benefits for bone health and a long history of safe use backed by an extensive body of observational and clinical studies that supports its use for reducing the risk for osteoporosis and hip, bone and other fractures.”

Meanwhile, Natasha Stewart, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation (BHF), noted that whilst the research indicates there may be an increased risk of having a heart attack for people who take calcium supplements ... “this does not mean that these supplements cause heart attacks.”

“Further research is needed to shed light on the relationship between calcium supplements and heart health,”​ said Stewart. “We need to determine whether potential risks of the supplements outweigh the benefits calcium can give sufferers of conditions such as osteoporosis.”

Study details

Rohrmann aqnd her colleagues base their findings on data from almost 24,000 participants from one of the German arms of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study – in Heidelberg.

All the participants, aged between 35 and 64, were quizzed about whether they regularly took vitamin or mineral supplements before having their health tracked for an average of 11 years.

During this time 354 heart attacks, 260 strokes, and 267 associated deaths occurred, said the researchers.

After taking account of factors likely to influence the results, those whose diets included a moderate amount (820 mg daily) of calcium from all sources, including supplements, had a 31% lower risk of having a heart attack than those in the bottom 25% of calcium intake, said Rohrmann and her team.

However those with an intake of more than 1100 mg daily did not have a significantly lower risk. There was no evidence that any level of calcium intake either protected against or increased the risk of stroke, which backs up the findings of other research, say the authors.

But when the analysis looked at vitamin and mineral supplements, Rohrmann found that those who took calcium supplements regularly were 86% more likely to have a heart attack than those who didn't use any supplements.

This risk increased further among those who used only calcium supplements – with this group more than twice as likely to have a heart attack as those who didn't take any supplements.

"This study suggests that increasing calcium intake from diet might not confer significant cardiovascular benefits, while calcium supplements, which might raise​ [heart attack] risk, should be taken with caution,”​ said Rohrmann and her team.

Source: Heart
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages 920-925, doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301345
"Associations of dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation with myocardial infarction and stroke risk and overall cardiovascular mortality in the Heidelberg cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study (EPIC-Heidelberg)"
Authors:Kuanrong Li, Rudolf Kaaks, Jakob Linseisen, Sabine Rohrmann

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Standard-Form & Functionally Optimized Nutrients

Standard-Form & Functionally Optimized Nutrients

Glanbia Nutritionals | 09-Mar-2023 | Product Brochure

Whether you’re looking to source the standard form of a nutrient or need a version that performs at its best in your product application, we have a robust...

Elasderma: Patented advance in molecule technology

Elasderma: Patented advance in molecule technology

Nutraceuticals Group | 05-Jan-2023 | Technical / White Paper

From Atlantic Cod, Elasderma is fully water soluble, additive free and a hydrolyzed form of Elastin that contains verifiable and quantitative levels of...

Related suppliers


Vitamin K Deficiency

Posted by Y.H.,

Bill, you may be right to some degree, but the problem is further upstream as indicated by Dr. Know (from the link in Doug's comment).

First, if post-menopausal women are losing bone mass, why is it landing in the arteries? Answer = vitamin K deficiency.

Second, if this is true, men wouldn't be affected as much, but the MI-calcium link is just as strong in both sexes.

Lastly, more specific to this study, the cohort included participants as young as 35 years old (46 by the end of the 11-yr follow-up)...pre-menopausal.

I can only conclude it's a wide-spread vitamin K deficiency, but that's just me.

Report abuse

No big deal, but I'm sure mass media will make it so

Posted by Doug,

Here's a good discussion on the study (and topic in general). You'll have to follow a couple suggested links in the article, but well worth it.

This probably isn't new for most in our industry.

Report abuse

Diet provides enough calcium

Posted by Bill Sardi,

Wake up natural products industry. When menopausal women lose calcium from bone, where is it going? Answer: to the arteries, where it stiffens them. Pouring more calcium into the barrel that has a hole in the bottom doesn't fix the problem. The estrogen signal must be replaced to hold calcium in bone. Phytoestrogens do this to some extent. The diet provides enough calcium. The CRN has been called to task on this but decides to protect industry sales, not public health. Shame, shame.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more