The legislative pressure on mandatory GMO labeling continues to build, at least on the state front, as...
|
Among recent warning letters sent by the US Food and Drug Administration to supplement manufacturers one stood...
|
A team of researchers may have taken a large step towards designing the optimal synbiotics for gut...
|
Live from VitaFoods 2013
Adam Ismail
Executive Director, GOED
|
Association to hold seminar on 'The Non-GMO Future'
Dietary supplement manufacturers need to consider the implications of possible GMO labeling initiatives, with the issue more...
|
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is threatening litigation against Bayer for alleged “deceptive practices...
|
The five associations representing the dietary supplement industry have asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to...
|
Don't Agree
Not a victory. Shelves are dominated by mainstream foods which are loaded with chemicals and other nasty stuff. It's very difficult for healthier options to compete if they can't communicate their health advantages.
There needs to be some other accepted standard for validating health benefits other than FDA review. FDA law says only a drug can "cure, prevent or treat a disease or illness". Under that law, suggesting that VITAMIN C or ZINC can prevent illness by supporting your immune system is flat-out illegal until you create supplements pumped full of other chemicals and additives.
Airborne is a good example of this. It's active ingredients are Vitamin C, Zinc and Echinacea - but you can't patent or make claims about that until you pump it full of dyes, preservatives, and artificial sweeteners.
Posted by Conrad Flynn
29 January 2013 | 02h00