SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Supplements & Nutrition - North AmericaEU edition

Trends > GMPs, QA & QC

FDA: Beware of Fraudulent ‘Dietary Supplements’

1 commentBy Shane Starling , 15-Mar-2011
Last updated on 16-Mar-2011 at 11:53 GMT2011-03-16T11:53:18Z

SuperBad? SuperPump is popular with gymgoers but the FDA is paying more attention to dietary supplements manufacturers and wants to know why manufacturer Gaspari Nutrition has not done more about AERs

SuperBad? SuperPump is popular with gymgoers but the FDA is paying more attention to dietary supplements manufacturers and wants to know why manufacturer Gaspari Nutrition has not done more about AERs

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today issued a statement warning consumers to “beware of fraudulent dietary supplements” as its labelling, GMP and AER crackdown continues.

The FDA reiterated a similar statement it made in December 2010, this time noting it had found almost 300 “fraudulent products” usually in the weight loss, sexual enhancement, and bodybuilding sectors containing FDA-approved drugs or their analogs or non-approved compounds such as synthetic steroids.

“These products are masquerading as dietary supplements—they may look like dietary supplements but they are not legal dietary supplements,” said Michael Levy, the FDA’s director in its Division of New Drugs and Labeling Compliance.

“Some of these products contain hidden prescription ingredients at levels much higher than those found in an approved drug product and are dangerous.”

FDA said adverse event reports (AERs) for such products included stroke, liver injury, kidney failure, heart palpitations, and death.

FDA noted it had, "worked with industry" to recall:

  • more than 40 products marketed for weight loss
  • more than 70 products marketed for sexual enhancement
  • more than 80 products marketed for body building

A link to the statement can be found here.

FDA warns Gaspari about adverse event violations

New Jersey-based body building dietary supplements manufacturer Gaspari Nutrition is the latest firm to be in breach of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) regulations after inspections in 2010 revealed AER breaches.

The FDA ‘483' inspections that occurred over a five week period between September 27 - November 1, 2010, found the maker of PlasmaJet and SuperPump products did not follow its own AER procedures in regard to seven separate complaints.

For those two products, the FDA said the company did not perform analysis of the complaints it classified as “minor discomfort”.

For a product called Mitotropin, complaints were classified as, "Serious Personal Injury Claims”, but Gaspari did not have them, “referred to the Senior Manager of Distributor Services or have the Senior Manager interview the complainants, as called for in your firm's written procedures.”

There was also a "Serious Personal Injury" complaint for SuperPump.

Gaspari responded to the FDA in November, 2010, saying it was rectifying the issues, but the FDA said the problems had not been resolved and added that it would be evaluating, “whether your firm has established and followed written procedures for reviewing product complaints during our next inspection.”

Bloody stools

The AERs included sores inside a consumer's mouth, as well as, "chest pain and abnormal kidney levels" after product consumption.

Gaspari also, “did not investigate the complaint of a consumer who contacted your firm regarding having bloody stools and excessive amounts of red color in their toilet water following consumption of your SuperPump dietary supplement product.”

A Gaspari spokesperson said the company had no comment on the letter.

The SuperPump250 Supplement Facts Panel can be found here.

1 comment (Comments are now closed)

FDA seeks to kill industry

Make no mistake these FDA rules are complete and utter nonesense that do nothing to improve the safety of dietary supplements. To the contrary, the FDA rules hinder industry and wealth creation, thus ensuring that industry can afford little by way of technical improvement.

The notion that a company needs to follow through on an AER is absurd to the core. Does a food production company need to follow through on every complaint? Why should dietary supplement companies be subject to rules that are fundamentally flawed? Under the FDA's guidance, a competitor could easily enlist 50 people to file serious false AERs against a competitor. What then? Will the FDA pick up the bill? After all, their rules are the basis in cost in such a scenario.

Quite simply, few freedom-loving people exist in the dietary supplement industry. Instead most people are state-worshipping fools who support rules that are easily used for malicious means. All the while they are working towards thier own demise. When the regulations mount, industry dies.

Report abuse

Posted by Jeff Richards
24 March 2011 | 18h332011-03-24T18:33:26Z

Related products

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...