Breaking News on Supplements & Nutrition - North AmericaEU edition

News > Regulation

Guest article

Defining ‘natural’ is a priority for NPA in 2014

4 commentsBy John Shaw, Executive Director and CEO, Natural Products Association , 18-Dec-2013

At the Natural Products Association, we are constantly working toward our mission of ensuring consumers have access to healthy products that will improve their well-being and longevity, and that the dedicated and passionate individuals who make and sell those products can continue to do so.

Over the last year, the debate surrounding the definition of “natural” has gotten louder and louder. Retailers and consumers are growing more confused by the lack of an official definition, and many manufacturers are faced with lawsuits after marketing their product as natural. It’s time for the industry to figure out just what natural means.

That’s why a major 2014 priority for NPA is to define “natural” for our industry. As the leading trade association representing the entire natural products industry, from concept to consumer, this is the “natural” (pun intended) next step for NPA to take.

There is currently no government standard for natural food, so it’s imperative that we define what natural means to ensure responsible labeling. It’s also crucial that we have educated people, those who know the ins and outs of this industry, working on the definition of natural. 

The industry cannot stand aside and let the courts decide the meaning of truly natural food. If we leave the issue up to the courts, we wouldn’t necessarily have a proper definition of natural, but rather a legal safe house. We wouldn’t have a standard that manufacturers have to strive to meet, but a definition that fits the lowest common denominator. And, frankly, that just isn’t acceptable for an industry that takes "natural" very seriously.

Input from suppliers, manufacturers and retailers

As NPA moves forward in the process to define natural, it’s important that we work with suppliers and manufacturers to see what can be done in the natural sector. Additionally, we will highlight the retailers’ feedback, especially as they bring forth the consumers’ perspectives as to what they believe is a natural product. Utilizing both of these viewpoints is an opportunity for NPA to make true progress in this important initiative. 

Along with looking into natural sources, processes, and formulations, NPA’s definition should also consider the long-burning question of whether products containing genetically modified ingredients are natural. There are nuances to this issue that NPA is best positioned to consider, especially in light of our supplier and retailer membership. While the white paper NPA published on GMOs stated that genetic modification is not found in nature, it’s crucial that a natural definition take more than just the GMO issue into consideration when dealing with an industry standard. 

Attainable standard

It’s not enough to write the best Natural Standard – NPA wants to write a strong, yet attainable, standard. We don’t want to raise the bar so high that no products can be labeled truly natural. Rather, as we did with the cosmetic and home care standard, we want to draw a line in the sand to set apart those companies that are doing the right thing for natural. Once we set the standard and start working with industry to meet it, then we can continue evolving it into the best definition of natural.   

Finally, to aid in this process, NPA is bolstering our scientific and regulatory affairs department with the addition of a food scientist. We’ve begun the search for a scientist to focus on nutrition, research, and regulations specific to the food industry. This person will be tasked with leading the path forward on this matter.

Much lies ahead in the journey to define natural, and NPA is steadily preparing to make the first move. It’s both an exciting and challenging time to be part this industry, and we eagerly anticipate all that 2014 will bring.

4 comments (Comments are now closed)

synthetic vitamins

I hope when they define natural, that synthetic vitamins are not allowed. Too many people are sold vitamins thinking that they are natural when they are not.

Report abuse

Posted by Josh
23 December 2013 | 16h53

GMOs aren't natural

The claim "natural" seems to be continually losing more credibility with the public, especially given the recent high-profile lawsuits against companies like Cargill and Pepsico, whose natural foods brand's products were found to be fraudulently making the "natural"labeling claim.

Industry-leading sales of non-GMO products makes clear how opposed to GMOs consumers are. In representing the natural foods industry the NPA in 2014 needs to align with the customers that support it and state its unequivocal opposition to companies continuing to label products containing GMOs as natural.
Thank you for your consideration.

Report abuse

Posted by Patrick Kerrigan
19 December 2013 | 23h25

natural stevia glicosydes?

In stevia matters, my opinion, is that the aproval of the use of 95% purity of stevia glicosydes... is no natural... yes is natural origin but, it is not natural. To get a real natural product you must get Organic certification for the stevia leaves and Organic certification for the industrial process. Europe aprove a chinese product (stevia glicosydes) 95% purity... but the 5% contain chemicals used during the industrial process. please read the EFSA ponion..

Report abuse

Posted by Marcelo Mendizabal
19 December 2013 | 20h16

Read all comments (4)

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...